Past Presentation Boards: Part 3

这篇博文是上周讨论的四个展板的继续。想要快速知道我之前说了什么，可以看这里。在大多数情况下，我保留了原始展板的整体布局，不过，我一直在调整某些元素，试图使内容更具有可读性。

This post is continuing off of the 4 boards discussed last week. To get up to speed on what I have already done so far, read this first. For the most part, I kept the overall layout of the original presentation, however, I have been tweaking certain elements and making adjustments in attempt to get the compositions to read clearer.

建筑展板 3－渲染图

原始渲染图展板上已经有太多的信息了。我觉得排版起到的作用不小，但是还是有一些无用的信息可以被删除。

1. 图片：和展板 1 相似，展板 3 上的图片也是去色后缺乏生机。当时，我以为我把建筑从去色的景观中脱颖而出。经过这几年经验的积累，我几乎不花时间把建筑从景观中孤立出来，而更多的时间是在创建建筑的景观上，使得建筑和景观互相融合，从而获得更好的关系。

2. 实体模型：真的没有任何理由把我的实体模型照片放到展板上。我认为这些照片会给我的竞赛加分。事实上，他们没有增加任何价值。

ARCHITECTURE PRESENTATION BOARD 3- RENDERINGS
The original rendering board had way too much information. I felt the layout worked, but there was some useless information that could be removed.
1. Imagery: Similar to board 1, the imagery on board 3 is too desaturated. At the time, I thought I was making the building stand out by desaturating the landscape. Over the years, however, I have spent less time trying to get my designs to stand out and more time playing up the site around the buildings in an effort to create a better relationship between the two.
2. Physical Model: There really isn’t any reason to have images of the physical model that I built for the project on the presentation boards. I thought that including these images would give me brownie points for the competition. In reality, they are not adding any value to the story that I want these boards to tell.

关于新的渲染图展板，我关注的第一件事就是添加颜色，把生机还给渲染图。很多的时间都花费在给渲染图添加颜色和叠加材质。我也专注于简化展板。现在主渲染图还有很多的空白部分，在底部的四个建筑细部图可以放大一点，这样在展板上展示效果会更好。有一个重要的细节是，怎样把新设计的博物馆和原来 Saarinen 建筑完美地衔接起来，但是我想尝试这件事。因此，我把它从其他的渲染图中分离出来，并把它的位置靠近立面图。

With the new rendering board, the first thing that I focused on was adding color and life back into the illustrations. A lot of time was spent just adding color overlays and textures to the existing illustrations. I also focused on simplifying the boards. The main image now has lots of room to breath, while the four vignettes at the bottom are larger and have more of a presence in the board instead of just floating in space. There is an important detail of how the new museum design connects to the original Saarinen building, and I wanted to play this up. I therefore separated it from the other vignettes and again related its location to the elevations.

建筑展板4-分析图

这张展板没有太多改动。因为我觉得这张展板不错。我觉得唯一需要做的一件事就是调整建筑屋顶平面的大小。看上去它和第一张展板的总平面图有冲突。与其它展板相比，底部的渲染图饱和度过低，由于某种原因我把它们褪色了，哈哈。

ARCHITECTURE PRESENTATION BOARD 4- DIAGRAMS
Not much changed with this board. I felt the layout worked well. The only thing that I thought needed adjusting was the size of the building roof plan illustration. I felt it competed too much with the board 1 site plan. As with the other boards, the illustrations at the bottom are too desaturated and for some reason I faded them out haha.

正如你所看到的，这两张图比较相似。我转移了一些周围的事物，使新的展板的格栅与其他新的展板的格栅联系起来。有些插图还添加了一些色调和纹理。

As you can see, the two are relatively similar. I shifted some things around so that the grid of the new board would relate to the grids of the other new boards. I also added some tone and textures to some of the illustrations.

最终作品

经过简单的颜色矫正和微小部分的移动，竞赛展板呈现出一些戏剧性的变化。该展板的原始结构依然存在，但这次，我犯了简单明了和信息数量之间平衡的矛盾。

THE FINAL COMPOSITION
With just some simple color corrections and minor composition moves, I was able to make some dramatic changes to the feel of the competition boards. The original structure of the boards is still there, but this time I erred on the side of simplicity and clarity vs. quantity of information.


出处：本文译自visualizingarchitecture.com/，转载请注明出处。