2021霍普杯
编者按：
期待已久的2021 UIA-霍普杯国际大学生建筑设计竞赛题目新鲜出炉啦！普利兹克建筑奖得主、OMA（大都会）建筑事务所及AMO创始人、哈佛大学教授雷姆·库哈斯（Rem Koolhaas）担任本次竞赛主席并拟定题目
雷姆·库哈斯
普利兹克建筑奖得主
OMA（大都会）建筑事务所及AMO创始人
哈佛大学教授
乡村困境——新乡村规划
COUNTRYSIDE DILEMMAS—— NEW RURAL PLANNING
云南翁丁古寨于2006年被列入重点乡村文化遗产保护名录。然而牛年伊始，一场大火烧毁了整个村庄。翁丁的火灾暴露了更为本质的困境，远非重建村庄的茅草屋顶和精美的木质建筑那么简单。正如我带领团队在世界许多地方调研时所发现的。我们正身处一个十字路口，需要思考中国乃至世界乡村的未来何去何从。
中国的乡村建设主要依靠自上而下的产业规划。和世界许多其他地方一样，这样的建设方式给乡村带了现代化以及显著的生活水平提升。但与此同时，传统生活方式中积淀的历史、自然和文化底蕴也遭到一定程度的破坏。自二十世纪70年代中国推行扶贫政策，直到2020年在全国范围、特别是在像翁丁古寨及其周边这样初步完成的地区，已经重塑了乡村的样貌。在实现这一重大里程碑的重要历史时刻，需要我们反思当初的工作方法，进一步思考这一具有全球性的问题：乡村规划未来的路该怎么走？
在这场斗争中，中国并非孤军奋战。在“乡村·未来”展览及同名书籍中，我与 AMO团队以及一大批专家合作展示了世界各地的建筑是如何极大地脱离了乡村。从俄罗斯迫在眉睫的环境灾难、西方对笛卡尔主义刻板形式的集体坚守，到历史文化保护以及不断增加的移民危机所带来的更严重的全球性后果，我们希望表明关于乡村的思考和规划对于人类共同的未来从未如此重要。
以往世界各地大范围的乡村规划中主要采用的是以产业和物质为基础、或被狭隘的市场利益驱使的规划方法，这两种方式均亟待革新。我们也看到，传统的遗产界定方式是如何在包装成旅游地的压力下崩溃的，导致我们所认为的真实的东西被掏空。而新的里程碑性质不同，它结合了雄心勃勃的可持续发展与乡村振兴等新目标，因而需要采用那些能认识到乡村生活品质的新做法。现实的环境和对更可持续的生活方式的追求，都促使我们重新思考我们与自然和文化的关系。很明显，新一代年轻人希望与乡村展开新形式的互动。非正式的工具和平台，如中国的农村淘宝、乡村社交媒体平台如“快手”，以及在撒哈拉以南地区运用的小型技术和金融插件，为规划、构建和体验乡村开启了新途径：提供了积极的城市与乡村混和的新型复合生活方式。除了方便和舒适，“真实”体验和聚焦所形成的真实性是最重要的。
乡村正从城市的“服务提供者”向着更深刻的角色发展，从根本上挑战建筑行业的范式，没有相关建筑学内容可供参考，乡村环境是对综合能力的检验，需要经济、基础设施、新旧技术和文化统筹协调，从而创造新体验。仅靠传统的工艺，无法实现我们想要的未来。
乡村工作也在挑战固有的建筑规划概念。由于目前乡村的诸多问题无法单纯依赖建造解决，它必须在将新思想、新要求、新方法和新参照更有效地结合和空间转译的基础上进行建设，而不是只靠正统的传统规划。在这样的背景下，被大火吞噬的翁丁古寨以及世界各地的其它乡村，应以有21世纪特色的新方式，通过重新思考规划、遗产、审美、价值、经济、发展和目标，实现更深远的乡村振兴。
我们邀请你提出设想或提交最好的案例研究范本，这些成果需要挑战现有的规划传统，并汇集最相关的、最有趣的可能性，对乡村的未来提出一个全新的、从根本上有所改变的理念。
The advent of the year of the Ox brought destruction to the ancient village of Wongding in Yunnan, which has been recognized as important cultural countryside heritage since 2006. The fire that raged through Wongding however exposed more fundamental dilemmas that go beyond replacing the village’s thatched roof tops and intricate wood constructions, which my team and I have been observing in many places in the world for some time now. It coincides with an important crossroads in thinking about the future of the countryside in China and beyond.
China’s rural development has been largely based on top-down industrial planning. Like in many places in the world this brought modernity to the countryside and offered dramatic improvements in the quality of life for many. It however also meant that historical, natural, and cultural quality concentrated in age old ways of living suffered. In 2020 the unprecedented anti-poverty campaigns in China that reshaped countrysides since the 1970s across the nation and specifically areas not unlike those we find in and around Wongding came to a first completion. This important milestone marks an important moment for reflection on this initial way of working not only for China: it demands new considerations on the future of planning the countryside.
China is not alone in this struggle. In the exhibition and book Countryside. The Future I showed with the AMO team and a large group of experts how far architecture has drifted from the countryside across the globe. From looming environmental disaster in Russia, the firm corporate grip of ruthless forms of Cartesianism in the West, to the larger global consequences of preservation and growing migration crises, we show that thinking and planning the countryside has never been more important for a shared future.
The old way of planning large swaths of countryside around the world was largely based on an industrial and material-based planning method or the narrow interests of markets. Both are up for reinvention. We also witness how conventional ways of defining heritage are buckling under pressure of packaged tourism, generating a hollowing of what we consider authentic. Combined with the new ambitious sustainability and rural revitalization goals, these are new milestones of a different nature, which need a new approach in it recognizing the quality of village life. Both the environment and the need for more sustainable ways of living urge us to rethink our relationships with nature and culture. It is also clear that a new generation wants a different form of interaction with the countryside. Informal tools and platforms like Chinese Rural Taobao, rural social media platform like Kwaisho, and small scaled technological and financial add-ons used in the Sub-Sahara, offer the start of a new toolkit for planning, framing, and experiencing the countryside: offering hybrid active lifestyles where countryside and urban activity generate a new blended life. Besides convenience and comfort, the authenticity of a ‘real’ experience and focus is paramount.
The countryside fundamentally challenges the paradigm of the architectural profession by requiring a more deeply ingrained role compared to being a city’s ‘service provider’. There might be no such thing as architecture related-information to fall back to. Rural context requires a skills set where economy, infrastructure, new and old technology, and culture have to work in unison, in order to generate new experiences. Solely mastering old arts and crafts will not bring the future that is needed.
Work in the countryside also challenges the notion of fixed construction plans. As many of the issues in the countryside are not exclusively solvable by construction alone, it must build more on an effective combination and spatial translation of new ideas, desires, methods and reference points rather than the orthodoxies of traditional planning. Within this context, the burning of Wongding, and all its cousins around the globe, should lead to a broader rejuvenation of the village in a new and striking 21st century way of rethinking planning, heritage, beauty, value, economy, development, and purpose.
We ask you to submit these ideas and or the best case studies examples that challenge existing planning tradition to collectively build a library of the most relevant and interesting possibilities to give a new fundamentally revised view of the future of the countryside.
成果应该提交在乡村开展的新实验性规划及方案，方案不局限于中国而是面向全球的乡村。
提交的设计方案应体现地方社区的参与以及社会、经济和新文化元素的融入。最理想的是你的设计会直接与地方合作。
成果应以新颖的方式（非噱头）利用新（数字）基础设施，并需要与大众（当代乡村）文化有关联。
成果应重点思考自身经济和生态的可持续性，并解决这一问题。
汇报形式：一个时长不超过2分钟的影片和三张A1展板。影片和展板格式不限。方案最好醒目突出、新颖有趣、振奋人心、引人注目。
如有需要，可使用平立剖面图和效果图。
影片不能出现暴露个人身份信息的内容。提交内容须配英文字幕。
Projects should propose new experimental planning formats and proposals in the countryside. These proposals are not limited to China and invite all countrysides across the globe.
The plans should show engagement with and involvement of local communities with a social, economic, and new cultural component. Ideally you work directly with locals.
Projects should make use of new (digital) infrastructures in a novel way, not as a gimmick and have a relationship with popular (contemporary countryside) culture.
Projects should strongly consider their own economic and ecological sustainability and address this.
Format for presentation is a movie no longer than 2:00 minutes and three A1 boards. The movie and boards have a free format. Make your projects stick out, striking, fresh, exciting and engaging.
Plans, sections, elevations and renderings can be used when relevant.
The movie is not allowed to show personally identifiable information. Your submission has to be subtitled in English.
本题目解析及视频由Rem Koolhaas, Stephan Petermann, Dongmei Yao共同完成
（关于翁丁古寨的更多资料请见霍普杯官网下载界面）
一等奖1组，获奖证书+奖金10万元人民币（含税）；
二等奖3组，获奖证书+奖金各3万元人民币（含税）；
三等奖8组，获奖证书+奖金各1万元人民币（含税）；
优秀奖若干名，颁发获奖证书
优秀指导教师奖若干名，颁发获奖证书；
1st Prize (1 team) :Certificate and 100,000 RMB (before tax);
2nd Prize (3 teams) :Certificate and 30,000 RMB (before tax);
3rd Prize (8 teams) :Certificate and 10,000 RMB (before tax);
Honorable Mentions (several teams):Certificate;
Advisors of prize-winning projects will also be awarded with certificates.
国际主办
国际建筑师协会（UIA）
主办单位
天津大学建筑学院
《城市·环境·设计》（UED）杂志社
联合主办机构
中央美术学院建筑学院
指导机构
全国高等学校建筑学专业教育评估委员会
中国美术家协会建筑艺术委员会
独家冠名
上海霍普建筑设计事务所股份有限公司
协办单位
清华大学建筑学院
同济大学建筑与城市规划学院
东南大学建筑学院
华南理工大学建筑学院
西安建筑科技大学建筑学院
重庆大学建筑城规学院
哈尔滨工业大学建筑学院
评委会主席
雷姆·库哈斯
评委会执行主席
崔愷
报名截止时间
2021年9月20日24:00（北京时间）
作品提交截止时间
2021年10月10日24:00（北京时间）
竞赛提交邮箱
hypcup@uedmagazine.net
报名方式
点击本文左下方的“阅读原文”报名；或扫描二维码登录霍普杯官方网站：HTTP://HYPCUP.UEDMAGAZINE.NET注册报名
Jury Chairman
Rem Koolhaas
Executive Jury Chairman
CUI Kai
Registration Deadline
24:00(GMT+8) September 20th,2021
Submission Deadline
24:00(GMT+8) October 10th,2021
Submission Email
hypcup@uedmagazine.net
Register Now！
Click "Read more" at the bottom of this article to register;Or scan QR code to log in to the official website of UIA-HYP Cup:HTTP://HYPCUP.UEDMAGAZINE.NET
▽
|
|
