设计方：Victor Vasilev事务所
摄影师：Adriano Pecchio

总部在意大利米兰的建筑事务所 Victor Vasilev重新对一座位于意大利卡拉拉的的住宅进行了居室室内设计。

项目描述住宅在20世纪九十年代建成，那时没有设计目标。房主想让室内看起来“Milanese”，即“超现代化”。

我决定彻底进行彻底返修，充分利用空间——3层楼共530平方米。这不是一个周末度假屋，而是家庭住宅。

所以设计的目的是在各方面都具有实用性的当代居家环境。材料板使用石灰华大理石和印尼柚木。

设计以简单的方形容积的组合为基础。定制的家具与住宅的建筑融为一体。几件“古典的”的设计作品为室内增色不少。

空间、材料、定制的家具以及间接照明交相呼应，构成了最终的设计。它散发出温暖、白色的光芒，是室内变得柔和。

家人想要一个水疗区。一间桑拿房、一个可供四人用的大浴缸以及按摩去都建在了地下室。我们又添加了一个带有折叠屏幕的家庭室。

房主的卧室、孩子们的卧室以及一间客卧都在一楼。

房主卧室里的低台与浴室形成了视觉联系，以避免明显的空间隔离感。设计了黑色的盥洗池以掩盖冷热水混合水龙头。

照片是在项目完工（2008）两年后拍摄的。在我看来，这是评估设计以及其建筑成果最好的方法——它是否不显旧并保持高质量。

特别鸣谢翻译一组10号 张晓丽 提供的翻译，译稿版权归译者所有，转载请注明出处。

---

Design: Victor Vasilev
Photography: Adriano Pecchio


Milan, Italy-based architect Victor Vasilev re-designed the interior of a house in Carrara, Italy.
Project description
The house was built in the 1990ies, without design ambitions. The owners wanted the interior to look ‘Milanese’, i.e. ‘ultramodern’. I decided on a complete overhaul, appreciating the space potential – 530 sq.m on three floors. This is not a weekend retreat but a family house and the aim was to create a contemporary domestic environment functional in every aspect. Travertine marble and Indonesian teak were chosen for the material palette.
The design is based on the composition of simple square volumes. The custom-made furniture is integrated in the architecture of the house. A few ‘classical’ design pieces enrich the interior.
The final result is achieved by the interplay of space, materials, custom-made furniture and indirect lighting. It gives out the warm, white glow, which softens the interior.
The family wanted a spa area. A sauna, a big bathtub for four and a massage area were constructed in the basement. A home cinema room with a folding screen was added.
The master bedroom, the children’s bedrooms and a guest bedroom are on the first floor. The low bench in the master bedroom serves as a visual link with the bathroom, thus avoiding distinctly divided spaces. The black washbasin is designed to hide the mixer taps. The photographs were taken two years after completion of the project (2008). In my view this is the best way to evaluate the design and its realization – if it ages well, it is good quality.